Kia C’eed GT, vehicle review: Modified hatch is warmer than standard, although not hot

Kia C’eed GT, vehicle review: Modified hatch is warmer than standard, although not hot

kia4.jpg

This can be a great hatchback – imagine warm, not hot…

Warmer than standard, but nonetheless sub-hot. That best covers the up-to-date form of Kia’s sporty hatchback, the C’eed GT.

Their taken that which was already a fairly impressive package that has been enhanced it having a tweaked front finish, bigger brake dvds along with a D-formed controls.

Everything complements the fir.6-litre turbo that, with 204bhp and 195lb foot of torque, puts lower sufficient muscle to warrant the GT badge – in day-to-day driving, a minimum of. In the tempo, however, and exactly why the C’eed GT isn’t promoted like a hot hatch becomes obvious.

kia3.jpg

The performance and efficiency balance can’t start to match those of more youthful, more complex rivals like the Honda Social Type R, which boasts 400cc and 100bhp within the Kia yet is cleaner and much more economical.

Kia C’eed GT

  • Engine: 1,591cc, four-cylinder turbo
  • Transmission: Six-speed manual, front-wheel drive
  • Power (hp): 204 @ 6,000rpm
  • Torque (lb ft): 195 @ 1,500-4,500rpm
  • 0-60mph: 7.3sec
  • Top speed: 143mph
  • Weight: From 1,367kg
  • Economy: 38.2mpg
  • CO2: 171g/km
  • Price: £23,615 (Basic of £23,105 and £510 for metallic paint)

The truth that the GT uses an electrical seem generator doesn’t exactly increase the authenticity from the experience…

There’s great news, however. A great all-rounder, because of a willing drivetrain teamed by having an accomplished platform.

Handling, grip and ride are confidence inspiring otherwise exhilarating, again underlining the car’s ‘warm’ nature. Drive modes are restricted to normalcy and GT, for than sufficient.

kia2.jpg

Other strong points are smart styling without and within, and Kia’s industry-leading seven-year warranty. This really is a good hatchback, so we shouldn’t be nit picking. Just think warm, not hot…

1 Comment

  1. quercus says:

    One problem is the

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *